 |
| The video below 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇 |
...Legal Experts Raise Concerns as Public Criticism Mounts
Renowned political economist and founder of the Shadow Government initiative, Professor Pat Utomi, is under fire for comments made during a recent media interview that touched on a case currently pending before a competent court of law. Legal experts and commentators have expressed concern that his remarks could amount to contempt of court, potentially exposing him to legal sanctions.
During the widely circulated interview, Prof. Utomi affirmed the continued functionality and legitimacy of the Shadow Government, despite an ongoing court case challenging its legality. His statements have since sparked reactions from observers who insist that the matter is sub judice and should not be discussed publicly until judicial proceedings are concluded.
One of the most pointed criticisms came from legal analyst and public commentator, Okoro Benedict, who questioned Utomi’s judgment in engaging with the subject at all.
“Prof, see intellectual difference! You, of all people, ought to know better. How on earth would you allow your interviewer to poke you so much that you talk about a case you rightly acknowledged is presently before a competent court?” Benedict queried.
He compared Utomi’s approach to that of a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Mr. Adamson, who, when asked similar questions, respectfully declined comment in line with judicial caution.
“Whereas SAN Adamson clearly declined comment, knowing his onion. Hmmmm! That's clearly contemptuous and prejudiced. I thought His Lordship warned parties against speaking on the matter? Another case in waiting…” Benedict added.
Legal practitioners warn that such statements—especially from a public figure of Utomi’s stature—could be interpreted as an attempt to influence the outcome of an ongoing judicial process, a violation that may prompt a contempt charge. Some have called on the court to take immediate steps to enforce its warnings against prejudicial commentary.
In a sarcastic but pointed remark, Benedict concluded:
“Don’t run to Ghana seeking asylum, cos the law is also sacred there!”
Efforts to reach Prof. Utomi for comments on the growing controversy were unsuccessful as of press time.
The incident underscores the delicate balance between public discourse and respect for judicial process, especially in politically charged matters. Legal observers are now watching closely to see whether the court will respond to the development or issue further warnings